Regulations for students in Year 4 can be found here
A copy of the regulations, glossary of terms and a student guide are all available at http://www.tlso.manchester.ac.uk/degree-regulations/
All awards of the University of Manchester will be given on the basis of the accumulation of credit as mapped out in table 1. This table is based on the credit/awards and levels required by the national Framework of Higher Education Qualifications (FHEQ):
Table 1: Credit and Award framework:
Name of Award |
Minimum credit for the award |
ECTS |
Minimum credits at the level of qualification required for an award |
ECTS |
FHEQ level |
Integrated Masters Degree |
480 |
240 |
120 |
60 |
7 |
Bachelors Degree with honours |
480 |
240 |
180 |
90 |
6 |
Bachelors Degree with honours |
360 |
180 |
90 |
45 |
6 |
Ordinary Bachelors Degree |
300 |
150 |
60 |
30 |
6 |
Diplomas of Higher Education (DipHE) |
240 |
120 |
90 |
45 |
5 |
Certificate of Higher Education (CertHE) |
120 |
60 |
90 |
45 |
4 |
Note 1: the table refers to the levels as defined in the FHEQ. It may be of assistance to the reader to understand that Level 7 of the FHEQ relates to a Masters, while levels 4, 5 and 6 correspond to years 1, 2 and 3 of an undergraduate degree.
Note 2: One ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) is equivalent to two UK credits.
Note 3: The column titled ‘minimum credits at the level of qualification required for an award’ is to be used when making awards only and is not to be used for the purpose of deciding progression.
All students who exit prior to completion of the programme on which they registered will receive an exit award if they have achieved the appropriate amount of credit in accordance with that award, as specified in table 1.
A student must achieve the minimum amount of credit at the level of the qualification in accordance with table 1. However, (subject to the programme requirements) students can take credit at a higher or lower level in order to achieve the minimum credit for the award.
Title of Taught Awards
Titles of degrees can be found in the University’s Regulation XI “Titles of Degrees and other Distinctions” at http://www.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/governance/generalregulations.pdf
Accreditation of Prior Learning - AP(E)L
A maximum of 120 credits of a three year Bachelors degree, and 240 credits for four year Bachelors degree can be considered for AP(E)L. A maximum time limit of 5 years should apply between award and consideration of AP(E)L.
AP(E)L may be used in exceptional circumstances for entry into Level 6 (or 7 of an Integrated Masters). However, a case must be made to and approved by the Faculty.
Students can receive an exit award if they have AP(E)L credit in their profile, providing their performance at the University of Manchester also satisfies the award requirements in table 1 and at least half of the credits have been awarded by the University of Manchester.
Schools can stipulate when AP(E)L is not allowed due to Professional Body requirements.
Assessment and Progression
Undergraduate students must pass a minimum of 40 credits on the first attempt at each level, including any compulsory units, specified by the School, in order to progress. When a student fails to do this they will have failed the level (see section on repeating the year or exit awards).
Undergraduate students progress on the basis of credit accumulation in accordance with the programme requirements. Students can progress once they have achieved enough credit as specified in the programme handbook at each level of their programme.
For MChem (Hons) Chemistry with International Study 60%
For MChem(Hons) Chemistry with Industrial Experience 55%
For all other MChem programmes 50%
Where a student has failed more than the required credits on the first attempt, or fails to meet progression requirements after compensation or reassessment, the Examination Board has the following options at its discretion:
The progression rules, D9 to D11 apply to progression to and from any year of study, regardless of level, except when progressing to the final year (level 7) of an integrated masters degree (see D14).
Schools may have alternative progression and assessment regulations where these are required by Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Bodies (PSRBs). However, should students fail to meet PSRB standards, but have succeeded in achieving University standards then a ‘non professional’ alternative award may be awarded by an Examination Board (see I41).
Students progressing to the final year (level 7) of an integrated masters must achieve an average of at least a lower second classification in order to progress.
Students in the School of Chemistry must achieve a minimum average of 55% in year 3 in order to progress to year 4 of an MChem programme.
Compensation
The compensation zone is defined by the Undergraduate Unit Marking Scheme, found in the Guide to the Taught Degree Regulations.
A maximum of 40 credits, per level, can be compensated at Level 4 and 5 of an undergraduate programme.
Compensated units will keep the original mark and this is used in the weighted average for the calculation of the final classification/award.
Referred assessment is compensatable (see paragraph F20 for details of referred assessment or reassessment).
Decisions on compensation are made by Examination Boards. Schools can specify when a unit is not compensatable or when PSRB rules take precedence.
The following course units cannot be compensated below a grade of 40%:
CHEM10600 Practical Chemistry
CHEM10101 Introductory Chemistry
CHEM10212 Basic Physical Chemistry
CHEM10312 Basic Inorganic Chemistry
CHEM10412 Organic Chemistry
PHAR10102 Properties of Medicines (for students on Chemistry with Medicinal Chemistry degree programmes
CHEM22600 Practical Chemistry
Progression on a programme which includes a period in a country speaking a foreign language requires reasonable progress to be made in the study of the foreign language.
Reassessment
Where the overall unit mark is below the compensation zone or the maximum amount of compensation has been exceeded, reassessment may be taken unless in the final year (or level 6) of a Bachelors degree (see section E) or the final years of an integrated masters (level 6 or 7). This is known as a ‘Referral’ and the referred assessment must be designed to assess the achievement of the same intended learning outcomes but need not be of the same form as that originally used. The referred assessment will normally take place in the same academic year as the original assessment to enable the students to progress as originally intended.
If an Examination Board has documented evidence that, (a) a student's work or attendance or both have been unsatisfactory, and (b) the student has been formally warned of the unsatisfactory work or attendance but has not shown significant improvement acceptable to the Board, then the Board has the right to refuse referred assessment. See ordinances/regulation XX - Work and Attendance of Students.
The Examination Board must specify the minimum circumstances to enable the student to progress and any remedial action required by the student, subject to teaching capacity not being exceeded (i.e. taking into account the number of students on a specific programme at one time). The examination board will decide which referred assessment should be taken, to achieve the credit to enable them to progress.
An Examination Board may allow a student one attempt, per unit, at referred assessment (two attempts in total). This principle does not apply to attempts with approved and verified mitigating circumstances. Additional attempts at assessment as a result of mitigating circumstances are known as ‘Deferrals’, are considered a first attempt and no cap is applied.
When a student fails to achieve the required credit after referred assessment, the Exam Board may decide to allow them to take the whole course unit again, on one further occasion, in attendance (see section G), subject to teaching capacity not being exceeded (i.e. consideration given to the number of students being taught within the course unit). This only applies to level 4 or 5.
Undergraduate students can be offered referrals in up to 80 credits, per level, except level 6 and 7 (see F28 for exceptions relating to PSRBs). The authority to decide which units are retaken rests with the Examination Board.
Referral pass marks will be capped at the lowest compensatable mark (30) for undergraduate students, unless the previous mark was within the compensation zone, in which case the original mark will stand.
If a student fails a referred assessment, the first mark stands and the student has failed to achieve the required credit (see section G on carrying forward failed credit).
Students cannot be referred in order to improve their marks at level 6 or 7. However, for students on programmes accredited by a PSRB, the following applies:
A student who fulfils the requirements for the award of a degree may seek to be reassessed in some units in the final year in order to achieve higher marks required by a relevant professional, statutory or regulatory body. However, the marks originally obtained will be used to determine the class of degree awarded to the student.
Carrying forward failed credit on undergraduate programmes
An Examination Board may exceptionally permit an undergraduate student to carry forward up to 20 failed credits. This decision will be based on a student’s academic standing and in cases of mitigating circumstances. The student should resit, in attendance, at the next available opportunity subject to teaching capacity not being exceeded. There may be restrictions imposed on programmes which have PSRB accreditation.
Credit for compulsory units cannot be carried over to subsequent levels.
Where sufficient evidence exists of the strength of the candidates overall performance, the School of Chemistry exam board may allow one core chemistry unit to be carried over to subsequent levels
Whole units must be repeated in attendance, with assessment taken in full and marks are capped to the lowest compensatable mark.
Students can only have one attempt at regaining credit carried over to a subsequent year/ level. If they fail to regain the credit, they will be considered for an exit award.
Optional units can be substituted but a replacement unit should not be considered a first sitting and there will be no further opportunities to regain the credit if the unit is failed after assessment/ reassessment.
Students should be advised by the Examination Board that if they fail the credit then they may not qualify for an Honours degree. Because 'carrying' extra units imposes a significant additional burden on the student, the Examination Board should give permission only where it judges that, in the light of previous results, the student is likely to be able to cope adequately.
Repeating the Level (120 credits)
Examination Boards are permitted to make a decision on academic grounds when deciding whether or not a student is academically suitable to repeat the entire level of study. This outcome of this decision is also subject to teaching capacity not being exceeded.
An undergraduate can normally only repeat the entire level on one occasion during the whole programme, at level 4 or 5 subject to teaching capacity not being exceeded. Exceptions may be permitted in cases of mitigating circumstances.
Fees are payable when entire levels are repeated as a result of a failure, without approved and verified mitigating circumstances.
A student who is repeating an entire level cannot carry over credit from the level that is repeated.
Schools may seek approval for alternative arrangements where professional body requirements take precedence. Professional Bodies might stipulate extra conditions or may not allow students to repeat any part of the programme.
Exit Awards
Once a student has exhausted all the opportunities to retrieve failed assessment they will be given an exit award in accordance with table 1, subject to the accrual of the appropriate number of credits, as defined in the Programme Specification.
All programmes must have approved exit awards.
If a student decides to withdraw, they will automatically be awarded the relevant exit award in accordance with table 1 and as defined in the Programme Specification.
Final year of an undergraduate (including integrated masters) programme
There will be no reassessment in the final year (level 6 or 7) unless it is a PSRB requirement (F28), in which case the originally obtained marks will be used to determine the class of degree awarded to such a student.
In order to qualify for an award, students must meet the credit criteria as stated in the credit and award framework (See: Table 1) and passed assessment as specified in the Unit/ Programme Specifications.
In year three (level 6) of a four year Integrated Masters programme, reassessment can be considered at the discretion of the Examination Board and based on the academic standing of the student and/or mitigating circumstances.
When considering classifications for classes 1st, 2:1 or 2:2, an Examination Board may award special compensation* for up to 40 credits at level 6 of a Bachelors degree programme or levels 6 or 7 of an integrated masters, for any failed unit, providing they meet the following criteria:
Has passed at least 80 credits at the level of the award.
* Information about special compensation can be found in the Taught Degree Regulations glossary of terms.
When considering classifications for classes 1st, 2:1 or 2:2, an Examination Board may award special compensation for up to 60 credits at level 6 of a Bachelors degree programme or levels 6 or 7 of an integrated masters, for any failed unit, providing they meet the following criteria:
Has passed at least 60 credits at the level of the award. However, there is a penalty applied due to the failure of more than 40 and up to 60 credits and the student will have the classification reduced to the classification below that which would have been awarded on the basis of the weighted average for the programme.
When considering classifications for a third class degree, an Examination Board may award special compensation for up to 60 credits at level 6 of a Bachelors degree programme for any failed unit, providing they meet the following criteria:
Has passed at least 60 credits at the level of the award.
Where special compensation is given, this is for credit only and the original unit marks are recorded and used to calculate the degree classification.
Where up to 20 credits have been carried over from level 5 to level 6, this credit may be considered under the special compensation regulations providing the maximum allowable has not been exceeded. This also applies to credit carried over from level 6 to level 7 of an Integrated Masters (see section G).
Ordinary Degrees can be awarded at the end of a programme of study where a student has obtained 300 credits, 60 of which must be at the level of the qualification (FHEQ level 6). Special compensation does not apply to Ordinary degrees. Students can also progress onto an Ordinary degree on the basis of decisions made by a School or Faculty misconduct committee/discipline panel or equivalent.
Classification of Integrated Masters programmes
Integrated Masters classifications will be decided using weighted total points for four year degrees. Schools can choose to implement either of the following options: 1 to Y4 (L4 to L7 FHEQ) using weights of 0.0 (L4), 0.2 (L5), 0.4 (L6) and 0.4 (L7); or 1 to Y4 (L4 to L7 FHEQ) using weights of 0.06 (L4), 0.19 (L5), 0.375 (L6) and 0.375 (L7); unless there are alternative requirements for external accreditation, (see Appendix A for boundaries for classification and boundary zone demarcation).
Weightings for MChem Programmes |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Chemistry |
0% |
20% |
40% |
40% |
Chemistry with Medicinal Chemistry |
0% |
20% |
40% |
40% |
Chemistry with Industrial Experience |
0% |
20% |
30% |
50% |
Chemistry with Study in Europe |
0% |
20% |
30% |
50% |
Chemistry with Study in North America |
0% |
20% |
30% |
50% |
Chemistry with Forensic and Analytical Chemistry |
0% |
20% |
40% |
40% |
Decisions with regards to ‘borderline’ classifications for individual students should be resolved using the mechanisms outlined in appendix A.
Classification in Bachelors programmes
To be considered for a Bachelors Degree a student must have achieved the requisite minimum credits listed in table 1 in accordance with the unit marking scheme and grade descriptors. Students who have not achieved the minimum credit requirement for an honours degree will be awarded an ordinary degree in accordance with table 1.
Bachelors degree classification will be decided using weighted total points for three year degrees. Schools can choose to implement either of the following options: Y1 to Y3 (L4 to 6 FHEQ) using weights of 0.0 (L4), 0.33 (L5), and 0.67 (L6) or Y1 to Y3 (L4 to 6 FHEQ) using weights of 0.1 (L4), 0.3 (L5), and 0.6 (L6).
Four year Bachelors programmes, including a year studying abroad or in Industrial Placement will be classified using L55 as a guide. Programme Handbooks must specify how/ if the year abroad/ on placement is assessed and credit weighted.
Four year taught Bachelors programmes will be will be classified using L55 as a guide. Programme Handbooks must specify how the programme is weighted.
Weightings for BSc Programmes |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Chemistry |
0% |
33% |
67% |
n/a |
Chemistry with Medicinal Chemistry |
0% |
33% |
67% |
n/a |
Chemistry with Industrial Experience |
0% |
33% |
0% |
67% |
Decisions with regards to ‘borderline’ classifications for individual students should be resolved using the mechanisms outlined in appendix A.
Aegrotat Degrees
The Examination Board may determine from evidence available to it that a candidate for an Honours degree who has been prevented by good cause from completing the final examination or assessment will be awarded a class of degree the Board judges to be suitable, as long as the candidate has gained over half the credits required for the award.
Examination Board Arrangements
There are normally three available assessment opportunities; January, May/ June and Aug/ September within each academic year. It is expected that all reassessment will take place in the academic year in which the assessment was first attempted.
There must be an opportunity after every assessment period for a chaired forum to make decisions regarding student’s attainment on completed units.
Examination Boards will take place at the end of each academic year or at points in the calendar were decisions are required with regards to progression, overseen by an External Examiner.
Appendix A Undergraduate Degree Classification Scheme
This scheme should be used in conjunction with ‘Table 1 of the Undergraduate Degree Regulations’. Table 1 has been extracted from the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications, and students must meet the credit requirements of Table1, prior to the classification being calculated, using the weightings, thresholds and boundaries below:
The Undergraduate Degree Classification Scheme is based upon weighted average using a 0-100 mark range calculated to one decimal place, where marks for individual course units are recorded as whole numbers.
Weightings
Bachelors degree classification will be decided using a weighted average for three year degrees (see L55). These weightings will also be used as a guide for four year Bachelors programmes and those which also include with a study abroad year or placement; unless there are alternative requirements for external accreditation by a PSRB.
Integrated masters programmes will be classified using the weightings in K52; unless there are alternative requirements for external accreditation by a PSRB;
Stage 1: Classification Thresholds and Boundaries
Bachelor degree classification using 0-100 mark range and 120 credits
The following boundaries inform classification when the weighted average falls below a classification threshold.
Table A1 Bachelors degree classification and boundary zone using weighted average with mark range 0-100:
Bachelors Degree classification weighted to 120 credits |
Classification thresholds: weighted average (0 to 100 mark range) |
Boundary zone weighted average |
First class |
70.0 |
68.0 to 69.9 |
Upper Second class |
60.0 |
58.0 to 59.9 |
Lower Second class |
50.0 |
48.0 to 49.9 |
Third class |
40.0 |
37.0 to 39.9 |
Consideration of bachelor degree students within the boundary zone by mark distribution
After allowances have been made for mitigating circumstances, a student whose weighted average at the first assessment is within the boundary zone specified above, must be awarded the higher degree classification as long as the following are satisfied (see also notes on AP(E)L):
2/3 of the credits at level 6 are equal to/higher than the final award (for example if the student is in the boundary between a 2.1 and a first, 2/3 of the credits must be at 70% or higher to fulfill this criteria and award the students a first class degree).
Integrated Masters degree classification using 0-100 mark range and 120 credits
The following boundaries inform classification when the weighted total average falls below a classification threshold.
Table A2 Integrated Masters degree classification and boundary zone using weighted average with 0-100 mark range
Integrated Masters classification-based on 120 credits |
Classification thresholds: weighted average (0 to 100 mark range) |
Boundary zone weighted average |
First class |
70.0 |
68.0 to 69.9 |
Upper Second class |
60.0 |
58.0 to 59.9 |
Lower Second class |
50.0 |
48.0 to 49.9 |
Fail |
Below 49.9 |
|
Consideration of integrated masters students within the boundary zone by mark distribution
After allowances have been made for mitigating circumstances, a student whose weighted average at the first assessment is within the boundary zone specified above, must be awarded the higher degree classification as long as the following are satisfied (see also notes on AP(E)L),
75 credits out of 120 in the final year (level 7) are equal to/or higher than the final award (for example if the student is in the boundary between a 2.1 and a first, 75 out of 120 credits must be at 70% or higher to fulfill this criteria and award the student a first class degree).
The following exit degree awards will NOT be considered for automatic promotion by mark distribution: BSc(Hons) Chemistry with Study in North America; BSc(Hons) Chemistry with Study in Europe; BSc(Hons) Industrial Chemistry.
Stage 2: Mark Review and use of Viva Voca
If a student is in the boundary zone of the average mark and does not satisfy the additional criteria, Schools will apply a further stage of ‘Mark Review’, overseen by an External Examiner. The process of ‘Mark Review’ should not change unit marks and can only influence the classification awarded.
Schools may choose to viva students once the process of ‘Mark Review’ has taken place and the results considered to be inconclusive. However, this option must be applied consistently across a whole School, be approved by the Faculty and programme handbooks must clearly articulate to students that it is an option.
In addition, Schools must prepare all students for vivas by offering them similar experiences and opportunities to gain the necessary skills within the assessment of the programme. Further advice on the use of vivas in Mark Review’ can be found in the ‘Guidance and Glossary: Taught Degree Regulations’.
The School of Chemistry will not use Vivas